In April of 2003, ALA went live with a content management system that staff and members had been working to select and implement for the better part of two years. Despite repeated assurances from the system developer that the system would meet ALA’s needs, it quickly became apparent that the system could not support ALA’s high demand and complicated organizational structure. After struggling for two years to correct problems and modify undesirable characteristics (e.g., server instability, long URLs, etc.), it was obvious the system would never conform to our expectations.
In March of 2005, ALA made the decision to purchase a replacement content management system. Using a staff team and member input, a request for proposals (RFP) was created. Twenty-one firms responded to the RFP with a wide variety of solutions. The field was narrowed down to five possibilities based on features, history, and cost. Of those five, two were selected for further scrutiny. The two were evaluated by staff and member volunteers with varying levels of CMS experience. Collage, from Serena, Inc., was chosen, and Duo Consulting of Chicago was chosen to facilitate the implementation of Collage.